Elections

Local elections (City/SouthCambs), May 2010: Castle

Summary: Elections to Cambridge City Council (and South Cambs District Council) in May 2010.
Polling date: Thursday 6th May 2010
Ward:
Candidates
(by surname):
  • John Linden James BUCKINGHAM  (Labour Party)
  • Warren CLEGG  (Conservative Party)
  • James Michael KENNEDY  (Green Party)
  • Simon Philip Jonathan KIGHTLEY  (Liberal Democrat)

Questions for Castle ward candidates (4 questions)

Jump to question:  1   2   3   4 

# Question 1

There is a major shortage of cycle parking all around the city. Cycle theft is over 10% of all reported crime in the County. Do you have any suggestions for locations for cycle parking? Would you be willing to see a very small proportion of on-street car parking being replaced by on-street cycle parking in your ward? How will you work towards a situation where every resident and every worker in every ward can keep a bike safe?

John Linden James BUCKINGHAM
(Labour Party)
The candidate has not responded to the survey.
Warren CLEGG
(Conservative Party)
The candidate has not responded to the survey.
James Michael KENNEDY
(Green Party)

Cambridge Cycling Campaign is a wonderfully active community group; of which I am a member and proud supporter, as well as a daily cycle user.

Cambridge Cycling Campaign's work has shown that Sheffield bike stands are space-efficient and popular with the City's cyclists. As Castle Ward councillor, I will fight for a reasonable reduction in on-street car parking to allow for more Sheffield bike stands. When the space of one car can accommodate 10 parked cycles, this would be a much more sensible, more economical, and more democratic allocation of parking space. It would be a much better use of public resources.

Cycle parking can accommodate some additional tree-planting in the City, which will improve the image and biodiversity of the City.

Cambridge can be a safer, cleaner and healthier City as a result, and more secure cycle parking will reduce the rate of cycle theft in the City. The City Council must work closely with Cambridge Cycling Campaign and its members, using its comprehensive City-wide research findings as guidance to achieving these goals.

Simon Philip Jonathan KIGHTLEY
(Liberal Democrat)

I agree that shortage of secure bike parking across the city is a major concern. New developments address this but there is plenty of scope for remedial action and I would certainly consider taking out the equivalent of single parking spaces in the suburban streets to provide bike securing points. This would be subject to local consultation. Within my ward there are relatively few points where this is high priority however, bearing in mind that the Histon Rd shops now lie outside the ward and are well provided for now. The closest to home for immediate improvement would be Quayside, with more securing points to serve Quayside itself, as well as Magdalene St/Bridge St. The Castle Team would welcome any further suggestions from the public.

# Question 2

Do you support our view that traffic policing (including fining of cyclists without lights or using pedestrian-only pavements) should become a greater police priority?

John Linden James BUCKINGHAM
(Labour Party)
The candidate has not responded to the survey.
Warren CLEGG
(Conservative Party)
The candidate has not responded to the survey.
James Michael KENNEDY
(Green Party)

Traffic policing must work in tandem with the provision of cycle routes and safe cycle lanes in and around the City. Cycle routes must be provided, and to ensure that these provisions are not mis-used (either by motor vehicles driving in cycle lanes; or by cylists riding on pavements), a police presence of reasonable proportion is required.

Traffic policing in Cambridge should remain a priority, where possible, for the health and safety of Cambridge citizens. Motor drivers become rightfully annoyed when cyclists swerve to avoid pot-holes in the road. I will push for increased resources to ensure that cycle lanes are smooth, relatively free of pot-holes, and to keep a reasonable traffic police presence in the City to allow cyclists, drivers and pedestrians to share the road safely.

Simon Philip Jonathan KIGHTLEY
(Liberal Democrat)

Through my position as Chair of the West Central Area Committee, I have repeatedly supported calls and pushed for exactly this type of police action and at the most recent of these meetings, opposed a police proposal to ease off on this particular campaign. My pet hate is cyclists going the wrong way round the one way system in town.

# Question 3

We believe that 20mph should be the norm for local streets in residential areas (as distinct from main connecting roads). 20mph would: greatly encourage walking and cycling; improve the quality of life in an area for residents; and would not delay car journeys significantly (because only the start/end of a journey would be affected). Do you agree that 20mph should become the norm for local streets in Cambridge and surrounding villages?

John Linden James BUCKINGHAM
(Labour Party)
The candidate has not responded to the survey.
Warren CLEGG
(Conservative Party)
The candidate has not responded to the survey.
James Michael KENNEDY
(Green Party)

Several Cambridge streets have campaigned for a 20mph limit successfully. Oxford Road near my house in Castle Ward achieved this last year.

I will push for a 20mph speed limit right across the City's residential areas. I am pleased to say that local Green councillors have been successful in achieving this in Norwich.

The City Council's proposed "20mph City" plan does not extend far enough. The 20mph boundary should be extended to include all residential areas of Castle Ward.

Simon Philip Jonathan KIGHTLEY
(Liberal Democrat)

Yes

# Question 4

Do you have any other general cycling-related comments or points? And what support have you given for cycling and walking, or sustainable transport more generally, in the past?

John Linden James BUCKINGHAM
(Labour Party)
The candidate has not responded to the survey.
Warren CLEGG
(Conservative Party)
The candidate has not responded to the survey.
James Michael KENNEDY
(Green Party)

I am a passionate cyclist, I cycle everywhere I need to go within Cambridge. I use trains when travelling further, and do not own a car.

The Green Party adhere to a transport hierarchy when local councils plan City infrastructure. Pedestrians and cycles are at the highest priority, followed by public transport, cars, freight and aviation. We believe that investment in transport should be apportioned according to where each mode lies in the hierarchy, within reason.

I support the Green Party's transport hierarchy for social reasons, as a more walkable, cyclable City with limited traffic-noise would promote harmony and reduce stress for all of us.

Greens have and always will support this as part of better, greener communities and a planet that we must look after. Road use must be democratic: and governments have the responsibility to facilitate all kinds of transport in an efficient, safe and pleasant manner.

Simon Philip Jonathan KIGHTLEY
(Liberal Democrat)

1. The cycleway from the city centre down towards the station is in an appalling condition and badly needs fixing.
2. I am very pleased to support the proposed new 3 metre-wide shared footway/cycleway from Madingley park and Ride to Northampton St. Be aware, however, that residents of Conduit Head Rd and Lansdowne Rd are concerned about problems of cars emerging across the cycleway and the danger to pedestrians from fast moving bikes. Please have bells on your bikes.
3. I have great frustration over the County Council's back-pedalling (sorry!) on the extension of the Huntingdon Rd 30mph zone to promote cycle and pedestrian safety. We will get there. In this case the police are being particularly unhelpful. They believe that 30 mph cannot be enforced. Yes it can. Get another speed camera.

Camcycle is a non-partisan body. All candidates are given an equal opportunity to submit their views. Information published by Camcycle (Cambridge Cycling Campaign), The Bike Depot, 140 Cowley Road, Cambridge, CB4 0DL.