Elections
Cambridge City Council elections, May 2023: Arbury
Summary: | Elections to Cambridge City Council in May 2023 |
Polling date: | Thursday 4th May 2023 |
Ward: |
|
Candidates (by surname): |
|
Questions for Arbury ward candidates (5 questions)
# Question 1
There is a lack of secure cycle parking for many residents in Arbury ward. Would you support more on-street cycle parking bays, and lockable cycle hangars or boxes for those living in flats or apartments in the area?
Responses to this question from all wards…
Robert William BOORMAN (Conservative Party) |
The candidate has not responded to the survey. |
Stephen Roger LAWRENCE (Green Party) |
Yes, this would be a key priority for me. There are so many barriers to cycling and one in particular is the lack of a safe place to store your bike in the context of such rampant bike theft in Cambridge. This is particularly important for people who use adapted or supported bikes, such as trikes, electric assisted bikes, and other adaptive cycles. I would work with the City Council housing officers to try and get these implemented throughout the housing estates in Arbury, and also work with the County Council to try and get these implemented in appropriate on road locations. |
Sam OLIVER (Liberal Democrat) |
Yes, and strongly campaign for it. Bike theft in Cambridge is a major issue and creates a financial barrier for people (especially if they require more expensive electric bikes). Secure cycle parking options are essential, especially for residents who do not have easy storage solutions in their own homes (getting a bike to a upper story flat is difficult and impractical). |
Mike TODD-JONES (Labour & Co-operative) |
Yes. I've previously worked closely with Arbury Housing officers over the installation of secure cycle parking areas at, for example, Hazelwood and Molewood Close and the Bermuda Flats. On-street options would probably mean liaising with the County Council Local Highways Officer, which I'm more than happy to do alongside County Cllr colleagues. |
# Question 2
Many local people would like to see more ‘modal filters’ to limit vehicle through-traffic. This creates nicer places for residents to live and a safe network of routes for those walking, cycling and wheeling. Modal filters already exist in locations such as Highworth Avenue/Leys Road, Daisy Close and between Warwick Road and Oxford Road.
Suggestions for new filters include bollards on Garden Walk, a School Street on Carlton Way and a bus gate with some added exemptions on Arbury Road. Which roads in Arbury do you think could become part of a safe cycling and walking network through the introduction of modal filters?
Responses to this question from all wards…
Robert William BOORMAN (Conservative Party) |
The candidate has not responded to the survey. |
Stephen Roger LAWRENCE (Green Party) |
The benefits to modal filters currently in situ on many quiet residential roads in the city are clear to see - and where they are present they are very popular with local people. They make roads safer for walking and cycling, and particularly for children to use, whist allowing cars to get to where they need to go without creating cut throughs that eg satellite navigation systems may direct drivers down. |
Sam OLIVER (Liberal Democrat) |
In principle, I am open to the idea of modal filters - especially to challenge drivers to think more carefully about their journeys and to reduce congestion and pollution on residential streets and high footfall areas. However, they need to be carefully thought through and trialled to avoid negative knock-on effects. I'm not sure that a filter on Garden Walk would be beneficial - it could actually make life harder for cyclists by making it difficult for drivers to turn around. However, a number of residents have suggested that a filter could work on the junction of Montgomery Road and Alex Wood Road - Montgomery Road isn't great for two way traffic, and it is easy to cut down when it isn't strictly necessary. |
Mike TODD-JONES (Labour & Co-operative) |
Again, I've already been closely involved with officers delivering Active Travel schemes and, with local resident support, have pushed for, e.g. bollards preventing vehicle through-access in Carlyle Road (at the time in Arbury ward). I also supported requests from residents in Alpha Road and Hertford Street for similar schemes so that 'the Triangle' area couldn't be used by vehicles cutting through from Victoria Road to Chesterton Road. I would support a School Street on Carlton Way to help safeguard children attending Arbury Primary School. Garden Walk is also worth considering, if residents support it, for a bollard scheme. A bus gate for Arbury Road is trickier as my view (and, I understand, the view of Project Officers for the current Milton Road scheme) is that any scheme for Arbury Road should wait until the Milton Road scheme is finished (and is also dependent on resident support). I would need to consult with my fellow ward Cllrs about other potential modal filters in Arbury. |
# Question 3
The 2021 census shows that 34.2% of households in Arbury do not have a car or van. What would you do to broaden the quality and affordability of transport options for non-car owners of all ages to improve access to education, jobs, healthcare and services?
Relevant links (each opens in a new window):
Responses to this question from all wards…
Robert William BOORMAN (Conservative Party) |
The candidate has not responded to the survey. |
Stephen Roger LAWRENCE (Green Party) |
The census results lay bare the reality of transportation in Arbury - and even those households that do have access to a car or van are likely to have household members who cannot rely on this method of transport. Many people, including myself, have faced huge problems with unreliable bus services, as well as expensive tickets and poor facilities at bus stops. I will campaign for greater control of buses including franchising of buses, and examine carefully any future proposals from the GCP in terms of the bus network serving Arbury. From the perspective of cycling and walking, there are two factors - firstly that the infrastructure is woefully inadequate in terms of upkeep of pavements, roads and cycle paths, and that there is a lack of safe pedestrian and cycle routes. Second, I would like as many services as possible within 15 minutes walk of local residents, so would campaign for new and improved community and essential services to be retained and improved in the heart of Arbury. |
Sam OLIVER (Liberal Democrat) |
Improving public transport is the only viable option for those who are unable to cycle. Increased public transport usage benefits everyone by lowering costs and enabling growth of services. Meanwhile, for those who can cycle, citywide improvements to cycling infrastructure are crucial. Safety is a significant factor when deciding to cycle, necessitating the implementation of cycle lanes that separate cyclists from fast-moving cars, connected cycle lanes that eliminate danger spots, parking facilities that provide secure parking for bikes, and security measures to prevent bike theft. These improvements are essential citywide, and I will strongly advocate for their implementation in Arbury. |
Mike TODD-JONES (Labour & Co-operative) |
The current proposals from the Greater Cambridge Partnership put a much-improved bus service network as a key part of their proposals. For those who don't have a car or van, a fast, frequent, cheap public transport alternative is really critical. Whatever the proposals that ultimately come forward from the GCP, a much-improved bus service has to be part of the equation. |
# Question 4
The latest work on the Cambridgeshire & Peterborough Local Transport Plan has shown that it would not be possible to meet local and national climate targets with a switch to electric motor vehicles alone. The Combined Authority has summarised a list of the interventions which could be integrated into the region's transport plan to assist with carbon reduction: which of these do you think are most needed in your area to help reduce car mileage and improve sustainable transport?
Relevant links (each opens in a new window):
Responses to this question from all wards…
Robert William BOORMAN (Conservative Party) |
The candidate has not responded to the survey. |
Stephen Roger LAWRENCE (Green Party) |
I think improvements to the state of roads, pavements, cycle paths and junctions is key. As above, as many facilities within 15 minutes walk of people’s homes will also enable people to do their errands locally. I think the option to safely cycle, walk or take public transport should be seen as a right for residents of Arbury. I support e-scooters in principle but think there should be some improvements to the current scheme, specifically regarding their parking which should be in dedicated racks. More generally I also support improvements to railways for example increases to rail frequency, reliability, and capacity, as well as new rail stations, and also better fare controls so that it is cheaper to take the train than drive to locations on train lines. |
Sam OLIVER (Liberal Democrat) |
According to the document, the problem at hand cannot be solved by a single solution alone, and instead requires a combination of various options. Along with the transition towards electric vehicles, I believe that enhancing cycling infrastructure, lowering bus fares, implementing bus priority measures, and incorporating demand management techniques to alleviate traffic would all promote alternative means of transportation and reduce reliance on cars. |
Mike TODD-JONES (Labour & Co-operative) |
I note that there is a mention of reducing car usage by 15% in the region in line with the recommendations from the Independent Climate Commission but there is no real plan on how the CPCA or LAs could make this reduction in car usage happen. Amongst the responses to the 2019 CPCA Local Transport Plan consultation, there are responses estimating that reaching a net zero transport system in the region requires a rapid modal shift away from ICE cars to public transport. Solutions suggested include car-free metropolitan areas (Cambridge, Peterborough, Ely, Huntingdon, St Neots), no new road building or expansions, rapid phase-out of city centre car parks, and removal of all on-street parking to make room for public transport and active travel. |
# Question 5
What is your personal experience of walking and cycling in your area? What do you think discourages local people from choosing active travel options for everyday journeys?
Responses to this question from all wards…
Robert William BOORMAN (Conservative Party) |
The candidate has not responded to the survey. |
Stephen Roger LAWRENCE (Green Party) |
I walk and cycle around Arbury often, and see first hand the many issues that prevent many people from being able to choose to walk or cycle. I think the cyclops junction has made a big difference to cycling and walking in this area and I would campaign for similar improvements at all other key junctions in Arbury. A lack of segregated cycleways on major roads is a big deterrent, and I support redesign of all major roads in Arbury to have fully segregated cycle paths. We should avoid dashed line cycle paths and other similar painted lines which are commonly entered by cars. There is also a lack of lighting on some routes, which makes the areas not feel safe for vulnerable residents particularly women. |
Sam OLIVER (Liberal Democrat) |
I try to walk and cycle wherever possible, but there are some signficiant deterrents. Alongside bike theft mentioned in question 1, the lack of segregated cycleways in some parts of the city is a problem, as well as a lack of lighting on some bike paths. Until we make it easier for more people to walk and cycle and improve public transport, many many people will continue to be put off active travel by the high levels of traffic and pollution on the roads. |
Mike TODD-JONES (Labour & Co-operative) |
I'm a regular cyclist (although I also drive) and have cycled to work and used my bike for leisure most of my life. Since representing Arbury as a local councillor, amongst the achievements that I'm proud of was chairing the Histon Road Local Liaison Forum, working with residents and the Project Officer to ensure that pedestrian, cycling, and bus improvements were delivered. Camcycle was one of the stakeholders and I liaised closely with the Camcycle representative on the 'cyclops' junction at Gilbert Road / Warwick Road. Histon Road is now, in my view, far safer and easy to use for cyclists and pedestrians. I was also closely involved with, and on the steering group with County Council officers, delivering the Arbury Road cycleway - another example of an installation that has made cycling much safer. Linking active travel schemes will encourage more use but has to be done sensibly with local resident support. |
Camcycle is a non-partisan body. All candidates are given an equal opportunity to submit their views. Information published by Camcycle (Cambridge Cycling Campaign), The Bike Depot, 140 Cowley Road, Cambridge, CB4 0DL.