You are in: Home
All photos in/around Cambridge
This listing only shows photos within a square radius of 15 kilometres of the centre of Cambridge.
Go to the national CycleStreets photo listings for photos beyond.
Showing items 1001 to 1100 from total of 16,954 items. Ordered by photo # descending.
| Photo # |
Photo | Caption | Categorisation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 33260 | ![]() | No cycle parking signs, but plenty of space in front on the pavement for proper sheffield stands | Cycle parking: Problem ![]() |
| 33259 | ![]() | No cycle parking signs, but plenty of space in front on the pavement for proper sheffield stands | Cycle parking: Problem ![]() |
| 33258 | ![]() | No cycle parking signs, but plenty of space in front on the pavement for proper sheffield stands | Cycle parking: Problem ![]() |
| 33257 | ![]() | Why does this new development have all this dreadful caging? | Obstruction: Problem ![]() |
| 33256 | ![]() | Why does this new development have all this dreadful caging rather than a direct pedestrian crossing? | Obstruction: Problem ![]() |
| 33255 | ![]() | Cycle parking at this plaza | Cycle parking: Good practice ![]() |
| 33254 | ![]() | Not obvious where the cycle parking is at this new development | Cycle parking: Problem ![]() |
| 33253 | ![]() | Why no cycle parking at this new development? Space on the right is available. | Cycle parking: Problem ![]() |
| 33252 | ![]() | Why no cycle parking at this new development? Space on the right is available. | Cycle parking: Problem ![]() |
| 33251 | ![]() | Why no cycle parking at this new café? | Cycle parking: Problem ![]() |
| 33250 | ![]() | Contradictory signage on Long Road | General sign/notice: Problem ![]() |
| 33249 | ![]() | Junction at Trumpington | Road environment: Infrastructure ![]() |
| 33248 | ![]() | Guided Bus cycleway link to Trumpington allotments: cycle parking | Cycle parking: Good practice ![]() |
| 33247 | ![]() | Guided Bus cycleway link to Trumpington allotments | Cycleway: Good practice ![]() |
| 33246 | ![]() | Guided Bus cycleway to Addenbrooke's | Cycle parking: Good practice ![]() |
| 33245 | ![]() | Guided Bus cycleway to Addenbrooke's | Cycle parking: Good practice ![]() |
| 33244 | ![]() | Guided Bus cycleway to Addenbrooke's | Cycleway: Good practice ![]() |
| 33243 | ![]() | Guided Bus cycleway to Addenbrooke's | Cycleway: Good practice ![]() |
| 33242 | ![]() | Guided Bus cycleway to Addenbrooke's | Cycleway: Good practice ![]() |
| 33241 | ![]() | Guided Bus cycleway to Addenbrooke's | Cycle parking: Good practice ![]() |
| 33240 | ![]() | Bell School development to Addenbrooke's link: this car parking will be very obstructive | Car parking: Problem ![]() |
| 33239 | ![]() | Bell School site | Destination: Misc ![]() |
| 33238 | ![]() | Bell School site to Addenbrooke's link location | Cycleway: Good practice ![]() |
| 33237 | ![]() | Bell School site to Addenbrooke's link location | Cycleway: Good practice ![]() |
| 33236 | ![]() | Poor entrance to Addenbrooke's | Obstruction: Problem ![]() |
| 33235 | ![]() | This car parking must all go if the new Addenbrooke's car park is approved | Car parking: Problem ![]() |
| 33234 | ![]() | Babraham Road: lack of priority at side-roads. The Bell School development's funding of cycleway improvements must fix this. | Cycleway: Problem ![]() |
| 33233 | ![]() | Bell School development: where the entrance road should be but which the planners failed to require | Road environment: Problem ![]() |
| 33232 | ![]() | Bell School development location of toucan; dutch-style cycleway needed from this point | Cycleway: Problem ![]() |
| 33231 | ![]() | Bell School development cycleway access location | Cycleway: Good practice ![]() |
| 33230 | ![]() | Bell School development cycleway access location | Cycleway: Good practice ![]() |
| 33229 | ![]() | Bell School development cycleway access location | Cycleway: Good practice ![]() |
| 33228 | ![]() | Bell School development plans being scrutinised by members of Cambridge Cycling Campaign | Road environment: Event ![]() |
| 33227 | ![]() | Road environment near the Bell School development: cycle-unfriendly | Road environment: Problem ![]() |
| 33226 | ![]() | Bell School development proposed entrance to the right | Road environment: Problem ![]() |
| 33225 | ![]() | Bell School development proposed entrance being discussed by members of Cambridge Cycling Campaign | Road environment: Event ![]() |
| 33224 | ![]() | Bell School development proposed entrance being discussed by members of Cambridge Cycling Campaign | Road environment: Event ![]() |
| 33223 | ![]() | Bell School development proposed entrance - clearly unsuitable space for a major development | Road environment: Problem ![]() |
| 33222 | ![]() | Bell School development proposed entrance - clearly unsuitable space for a major development | Road environment: Problem ![]() |
| 33221 | ![]() | Historical signage | Route sign: Infrastructure ![]() |
| 33220 | ![]() | Upgraded cycle racks | Cycle parking: Good practice ![]() |
| 33219 | ![]() | Cycle contraflow | Cycleway: Good practice ![]() |
| 33218 | ![]() | Except for access signage | Cycleway: Infrastructure ![]() |
| 33217 | ![]() | No Motor Vehicles signage for this contraflow | General sign/notice: Problem ![]() |
| 33216 | ![]() | Grange road cycle lane returned at last. Compare the red with the pink surfacing on the route from the UL | Cycleway: Infrastructure ![]() |
| 33215 | ![]() | Grange road cycle lane returned at last | Cycleway: Infrastructure ![]() |
| 33214 | ![]() | Grange road cycle lane returned at last | Cycleway: Infrastructure ![]() |
| 33210 | ![]() | The development team gets together to do some Geovating - scoping work for the forthcoming campaigning toolkit project. | Other: Event ![]() |
| 33204 | ![]() | All the petersfield pubs could do with more places to lock your bike up... Blue, Dev, Kingston, Dobblers, Geldart. | Cycle parking: Problem ![]() |
| 33203 | ![]() | Debating map cartography | Other: Event ![]() |
| 33195 | ![]() | There is no cycle parking in this area, despite the number of houses and flats nearby. | Cycle parking: Problem ![]() |
| 33189 | ![]() | The new cycle parking at the Scott Polar Research Institute is rather poorly located and is installed badly (stands are too high) | Cycle parking: Problem ![]() |
| 33183 | ![]() | Space for cycle parking on Christ's Lane. | Cycle parking: Problem ![]() |
| 33182 | ![]() | Space to formalise secure cycle parking along Christ's Lane. | Cycle parking: Problem ![]() |
| 33181 | ![]() | Poles have been left in the new cycleway. | Obstruction: Problem ![]() |
| 33176 | ![]() | Busway maintenance track blocked by maintenance vehicle (how dare they?) - in fact we crept past on the right. | Obstruction: Event ![]() |
| 33175 | ![]() | If you want to come from Addenbrooke's Road and follow the cycle track north to Trumpington you have to cross the Park & Ride slip road twice - bad planning? | Cycleway: Problem ![]() |
| 33174 | ![]() | 'Summer 2011' ?? and the cycle route was meant to open before the houses. | General sign/notice: Problem ![]() |
| 33172 | ![]() | Shared use path from Toft to Comberton | Cycleway: Infrastructure ![]() |
| 33171 | ![]() | Cycle route into Cambourne from the east | Cycleway: Infrastructure ![]() |
| 33170 | ![]() | Two routes into Cambourne from the east | Cycleway: Infrastructure ![]() |
| 33169 | ![]() | Route through nature reserve, Cambourne | Cycleway: Infrastructure ![]() |
| 33168 | ![]() | Parking in Upper Cambourne community gardens | Cycle parking: Infrastructure ![]() |
| 33167 | ![]() | Route through nature reserve, Cambourne | Cycleway: Infrastructure ![]() |
| 33166 | ![]() | Route through nature reserve, Cambourne | Cycleway: Infrastructure ![]() |
| 33165 | ![]() | Parking at Upper Cambourne Village Green (approximate location) | Cycle parking: Infrastructure ![]() |
| 33164 | ![]() | Parking at Upper Cambourne Village Green | Cycle parking: Infrastructure ![]() |
| 33163 | ![]() | More car-centred development in Cambourne... | Road environment: Infrastructure ![]() |
| 33162 | ![]() | Good covered parking at The Hub (Cambourne Community Centre) | Cycle parking: Infrastructure ![]() |
| 33161 | ![]() | One Sheffield stand at Cambourne police station. Better than none at all. | Cycle parking: Infrastructure ![]() |
| 33160 | ![]() | Permeability in Cambourne, though more for pedestrians than for cyclists | Cycleway: Infrastructure ![]() |
| 33158 | ![]() | Unsurfaced paths in Cambourne | Cycleway: Infrastructure ![]() |
| 33157 | ![]() | One of the nice things about Cambourne is that there are no Cycling or No Cycling signs - you can just go wherever it seems sensible. | Cycleway: Good practice ![]() |
| 33155 | ![]() | Proper cycle parking needed along Christ's Lane - there is enough space here | Cycle parking: Problem ![]() |
| 33154 | ![]() | Cycle parking needed on-street at the expense of two car parking spaces, outside Brown's | Cycle parking: Problem ![]() |
| 33118 | ![]() | Video made by Cambridge Cycling Campaign in 1998 about the abysmal cycle parking situation at the station. The situation is still as bad as ever, 13 years on. From http://www.camcycle.org.uk/campaigning/videos/#nbw1998b | Cycle parking: Problem ![]() |
| 33101 | ![]() | Hills Road bridge | Cycleway: Good practice ![]() |
| 33089 | ![]() | Bridge near nine wells | Destination: Misc ![]() |
| 33049 | ![]() | Next to the Kymoy restaurant 52 Mill Road - can sereve sev eral restaurantrs in the vicinity . 2 stands | Cycle parking: Problem ![]() |
| 33040 | ![]() | Path through this development. The houses here have their own garages nearby so this is a bit of open space. Unfortunately there is no convenient dropped-kerb onto the road here. | Road environment: Infrastructure ![]() |
| 33038 | ![]() | Seemingly pointless gate on this connecting route between Green End road and Gainsborough Close. | Obstruction: Infrastructure ![]() |
| 33037 | ![]() | Cut through between Green End Road and Gainsborough Close. | Cycleway: Good practice ![]() |
| 33033 | ![]() | The signs from 33032. Could so with being rationalised (a new NCN11 sign has been tacked on the bottom) and the road sign to the station is looking rather tatty. However, they're all useless thanks to the tree that hides them! | Route sign: Problem ![]() |
| 33032 | ![]() | cycle (and other road) signs. Honest. Includes a new NCN11 sign. | Route sign: Problem ![]() |
| 33031 | ![]() | New sign for the NCN11 re-routing through Whittlesford and Duxford | Route sign: Good practice ![]() |
| 33030 | ![]() | New signs for rerouting of NCN 11 through Whittlesford | Route sign: Good practice ![]() |
| 32963 | ![]() | Pickfords van driving in cycle lane, narrow cycle lane, and general poor road surface. | Road environment: Infrastructure ![]() |
| 32962 | ![]() | car driving in cycle lane, narrow cycle lane width | Obstruction: Infrastructure ![]() |
| 32960 | ![]() | Junction of Hills rd and Station rd, lorry driving in narrow cycle lane | Road environment: Infrastructure ![]() |
| 32959 | ![]() | Narrow cycle lanes, Mowbray Rd, especially after rain cyclist avoiding puddles, similar to #32958 | Road environment: Infrastructure ![]() |
| 32958 | ![]() | Narrow cycle lanes, Mowbray Rd, especially after rain. cyclist avoiding puddles. | Other: Infrastructure ![]() |
| 32934 | ![]() | more exposed underlay | Other: Misc ![]() |
| 32933 | ![]() | Detailed view of the make up of the surface material, zoom in on the photo to get a good idea of the quantity of glass in the overlay. It also shows the elevation of the bridleway, the busway is about 200m further down. | Cycleway: Problem ![]() |
| 32932 | ![]() | The inadequate surface covering doesn't even run the length of the bridleway. | Cycleway: Problem ![]() |
| 32931 | ![]() | Sign posts have still not been replaced at either end of the bridleway | Cycleway: Problem ![]() |
| 32930 | ![]() | Exposed underlay near the nature reserve gate at the Over bridleway | Cycleway: Problem ![]() |
| 32929 | ![]() | New crosshairs concept for CycleStreets mobile site | Other: Event ![]() |
| 32928 | ![]() | The bushes along the path are overgrown for quite a distance, pushing pedestrians and cyclists onto the grass. The footing is less firm, and there could be an accident. | Obstruction: Problem ![]() |
| 32848 | ![]() | Is this the same Grand Arcade that opened in 2008? | Route sign: Problem ![]() |
| 32847 | ![]() | It's hard to see the point of this narrow shared-use cycleway. | Cycleway: Infrastructure ![]() |


Request cycle parking and report obstructions













































































































