Skip navigation

You are in:  Home

Details of photo are below

Red X marks spot is where photo taken

Photo number: Icon12789 Icon

Icon Copyright Icon View full-size original

Photo #12789

I have now solved the mystery of why this path is narrower than the usual 4 metres and why it had its width written on it. The path was resurfaced a few days after this photo was taken. The width was written on to make sure the contractor didn't make it wider as this would have meant it crept onto private property.

Occasionally the council has to be pragmatic and can't keep to the normal 4 metre width for cycle paths.

To see this in use see #12790

Comments reflect the views of the original submitter only.

 
Categorisation: Bollard, pinchpoint surface: An example of good practice
Date and time: 3.31pm, 19th February, 2008
Facing: South West
Looking: horizontal
Distance of subject: Medium
Elevation: 2m above ground
Longitude: 6.531723
Latitude: 52.998936
Zoom: 16
Rating: 0
License: CC Attribution-Share Alike (by-sa)
Visibility: Public
Gallery appearances:
Give feedback

We welcome your feedback, especially to report bugs or give us route feedback.
My comments relate to: *





Your comments: *
URL of page: * http://www.camcycle.org.uk/map/location/12789/
How did you find out about CycleStreets?:
Your name:
Our ref:

* Items marked with an asterisk [*] are required fields and must be fully completed.