You are in: Home » Mapping and photo-maps » Photomap
Online mapping: Nearby photos
Photo Number #10114
This one-way street could be opened up for two-way cycling, providing more attractive alternatives to the busier and congested routes.
The comments and images here are not necessarily the policy view of the Campaign but reflect the views of the original submitter.
Photos Nearby
This list of photos is ordered by nearest first. See also earlier and later photos.
This one-way street could be opened up for two-way cycling, providing more attractive alternatives to the busier and congested routes.
0 metres
Although marked No Cycling, this jitty is a really useful short cut to Leicester Road.
4 metres
Entry into Hinckley's Pedestrian Zone does not prohibit cycling, but in the distance "No Cycling" signs have appeared underneath the One Way arrows.
161 metres
The up arrows at either side of the street indicate that this is a one-way street. The panels underneath say "No Cycling", but the correct sign for no cycling is circular with a red border with a cycle symbol in the middle. Therefore the ... [more]
196 metres
Whichever Highway Authority is currently responsible for Hinckley - and its not alway obvious who is dong what these days - but whoever it is, they have lost the plot completely. These No Cycling panels have recently appeared in this one wa ... [more]
251 metres
Bishop's Walk, Hinckley One rule for drivers, one rule for cyclists in this narrow 'walk'. A sign at the far end bans cyclists from using this route, but there is no such sign at this end which is used by residents who are allowed to dr ... [more]
256 metres
"No Cycling" panels have been added to these One Way street signs in Castle Street, Hinckley. What these signs are in effect saying is that all vehicles except cycles are permitted. Unless I've missed something big in cycling, these signs a ... [more]
276 metres
advice to dog walkers: "CLEAN IT UP" and there's a picture of a dog and some poo
302 metres
Leicestershire Highways Authority have advised me that for this 'No Cycling' sign... "there is no trace of an order being made and I suspect the 'no cycling sign' was simply put up on site without the associated written order.' They have ... [more]
312 metres
Celebrating the removal of an illegally placed No Cycling sign! (See #10620.)
316 metres
The no-cycling sign here seems to be totally mean-spirited here. This connecting route is amply wide enough for cycling, and is used by motor vehicles for access and parking. Still it is a nice play area for children, who inevitably cycle ... [more]
371 metres
The "No Cycling" panel underneath this No Entry sign is redundant, and probably illegal.
456 metres
The no entry signs, with their ridiculous "No Cycling" sub-panels did not stop this van driver going the wrong way up this 'pedestrianised' one-way street.
461 metres
Published: letter in Hinckley Times pleading not to introduce cycling ban like the one in Cambridge.
465 metres
No Entry signs with the illegal No Cycling panels are still here several months after they were reported.
468 metres
More dreadful 'nappy pin' 'cycle parking'. The user here has rammed their down tube into the middle of the spiral.
478 metres
No-Entry signs from which the "Except Cycles" panels have now been removed.
525 metres
No Entry sign with "Except Cycles" in Hinckley, Leicestershire. This comment from the Highways Authority explains... "The sign was installed in 2003 by our Major Transport Projects team as part of the Hinckley town centre development s ... [more]
529 metres
This is a particularly horrible stretch of road for pedestrians. Cars are parked on both sides of the road, either completely on the pavement or accross it. These 'shark's teeth' are evidence of speeding traffic approaching the zebra crossi ... [more]
581 metres
Top of page